Head-to-Head: Lodash vs Ramda Analysis

lodash

v4.17.21(over 3 years ago)

This package was last published over a year ago. It may not be actively maintained.Types definitions are provided via a separate npm package: @types/lodashNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

Lodash is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides a collection of useful functions for common programming tasks. It offers a wide range of functions for manipulating arrays, objects, strings, numbers, and collections. It also provides functions for working with functions, chaining operations, and more. One of the key features of Lodash is its ability to improve code quality and performance by providing optimized functions for handling common operations.

Alternatives: underscore, ramda, date-fns

Tags: javascriptutilitylibraryoptimizationperformance

ramda

v0.30.1(30 days ago)

This package is actively maintained.Types definitions are provided via a separate npm package: @types/ramdaNumber of direct dependencies: 0Monthly npm downloads

Ramda is a functional programming library for JavaScript that emphasizes immutability and side-effect-free functions. It provides a set of utility functions that enable a functional programming style, such as map, filter, reduce, and compose. Ramda encourages a declarative and concise coding approach by promoting the use of function composition and currying.

Alternatives: lodash, underscore, immutable.js

Tags: javascriptfunctional-programmingimmutableutility-functionscurrying

Fight!

Functional Programming

Ramda is designed with a functional programming paradigm in mind, providing immutable data structures and functions that do not mutate data. Lodash, while offering functional programming utilities, is not purely functional and allows mutable operations.

Bundle Size

Ramda is more modular and tree-shakable, allowing you to import only the functions you need, which can result in a smaller bundle size. Lodash, on the other hand, has a larger bundle size due to its monolithic nature, but it provides a wide range of utility functions in a single package.

Performance

In terms of performance, Lodash is generally faster for simple operations due to its optimized implementations. Ramda, being more focused on functional programming and immutability, might have a performance overhead for certain operations, especially when dealing with large datasets.

API Design

Ramda's API is more consistent and follows a functional programming style, with functions that are automatically curried and data-last. Lodash, while providing a rich set of utility functions, follows a more traditional imperative style with data-first functions.

Community and Support

Lodash has been a popular utility library for a long time and has a large community with extensive documentation and resources available. Ramda, while gaining popularity in functional programming circles, might have a smaller community and fewer resources compared to Lodash.

TypeScript Support

Both Lodash and Ramda have TypeScript support, but Ramda's functional nature aligns better with TypeScript's type system, providing better type inference and safety compared to Lodash.